The first salvo was fired by the immediate past Akwa Ibom State
Governor and now senator-elect, Chief Godswill Akpabio. In trying to
help out a House of Representatives member-elect from Akwa Ibom who was
being heckled for his long-winding comment, Akpabio said it was
important for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to take appropriate
lessons from its recent defeat at the polls.
Using himself as an
example, Akpabio added that despite his achievements in Akwa Ibom, the
party refused to showcase him and others to the Nigerian electorate
because of envy; and perhaps for that reason also, PDP Governors were
deliberately left out of the presidential campaign. “I practically had
to go to the villa where, as Chairman of the PDP Governors Forum, I
spent about three hours begging the president (Dr. Goodluck Jonathan) to
accommodate the governors in the presidential campaign.”
Akpabio said but for his intervention, the compromise eventually
arrived at by which PDP governors were appointed campaign coordinators
for their states would not have happened. “Some of us were perpetually
under suspicion because of envy. Can you imagine that it was only after
the election that I learnt that our party even had what they called
‘situation room’ where they had some consultants, including white men?,”
asked Akpabio who argued that the PDP went into the presidential
election as a house divided against itself.
As if on cue, the National Publicity Secretary, Chief Olisa Metuh who
spoke next, said he would direct his question at me, since I was on the
podium and my intervention had drawn some responses from the audience
that he evidently did not like. “Now, Segun, I want you to respond to
this: If as the National Publicity Secretary of the ruling party, I had
nothing to work with such that I would be running my office with my own
money, how effective can I be? And if in running the presidential
campaign the National Working Committee members were sidelined, should
we take the blame for the party’s failure?...”
As Metuh was speaking, evidently very angry, Dr. Kema Chikwe, the
National Women Leader who was seated by his side, was nodding her head
and urging him on with many people in the audience clapping. At that
point, it was evident that the session was getting out of turn and many
of the leaders, including Senate President David Mark had to plead with
Metuh to “cool down”. But Metuh, who had apparently taken offence by the
comment from a member who quoted APC Spokesman, Alhaji Lai Mohammed as
saying that he (Metuh) needed capacity training on being an opposition
spokesman, would not relent.
I watched the foregoing drama in Port Harcourt on Monday as one of the
resource persons invited fora retreat of the PDP National Assembly
members-elect. And it was just as well that former President Goodluck
Jonathan, who was supposed to be the keynote speaker,did not turn up
given the slant of discussion on how the presidential campaign was
mismanaged. Yet in attendance at Port Harcourt were almost all the PDP
heavyweights: from the NWC members led by acting chairman, Chief Uche
Secondus to former governors (many of who are now senators-elect) to the
returning and new Governors as well as PDP members and members-elect in
the National Assembly led by Mark, Deputy Senate President Ike
Ekweremadu and (Deputy) House Speaker, Emeka Ihedioha.
I was invited to speak on “Managing Effective Communications by the
Opposition Party” while otherresource persons included Mr. John
Tomeszewski, the IRI Country Director in
Kenya and Professor Sam Egwu of the Political Science Department,
University of Jos. Also invited from the Ghanaian Parliament to share
insights were: Speaker, Hon. Edward K. Doe Adjaho; Majority Leader, Hon.
Alban S. K. Bagbin and the Minority Leader, Hon. Osei
Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu.
In his opening address, Ekweremadu, whose office coordinated the
retreat on behalf of the PDP, explained that having been the ruling
party for the past 16 years, “it means that we have no cognate
experience in playing opposition politics as a party. And for the
National Assembly Members-elect in particular, we have no experience in
minority parliamentary role.”
Ekweremadu argued that unless a man knows where the rain started
beating him, he might never know where it stopped, adding that “we
should admit that the PDP’s journey from a ruling to an opposition party
was not a sudden flight. We did not appear to have managed our success
well. We appeared to have taken a lot of things for granted. We did not
also appear to have taken full cognisance of our successive dwindling
electoral fortunes over the years or the trend of electoral revolutions
going on in other emerging democracies around us in which ruling parties
lost control of power to the opposition.”
Providing statistics of the gradual decline of PDP before the crash of
March 2015, Ekweremadu said: “In 1999, the PDP had a comfortable
majority with 214 seats in the House of Representatives. It peaked at
263 in 2007 and dropped to 208 and 137 in 2011 and 2015, respectively.
The loss of a whooping 55 seats in 2011 should have set the alarm
ringing in the party. Likewise, our performance in the senatorial
elections peaked at 87 seats in 2007 and shrank to 71 in 2011 before
crashing to an all-time low of 49 seats in the 2015 general elections.
Thus, the loss of 16 senatorial seats in 2011 should have served as a
bad omen. Even in the gubernatorial elections, the drop from 28 states,
which the PDP controlled in 2003 and 2007, to 23 by 2011 was enough sign
that all was not well. It should have served as a catalyst for rescue
mission before it plummeted to an unprecedented 13 states in 2015. And
in the presidential election, the fact that the incumbent, President
Muhammadu Buhari, who hardly garnered reasonable votes in 2003 and 2007
polled a whooping 12 million votes on the platform of a brand new party,
the Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) in 2011 was a clear
handwriting on the wall for us. Whether or not we heeded these warnings
is now a subject for sober reflections.”
With Ekweremadu setting the tone, what followed were frank
interventions from PDP leaders who admitted being the architects of
their own electoral misfortunes at the polls. But the opening ceremony
was not devoid of its own drama as there was an interesting altercation
between the former Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC)
Chairman, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu and Senate President Mark, on the
remunerations of National Assembly members.
In calling for a public disclosure of the take-home pay of Senators and
House of Representatives members, Ribadu had said: “If Nigerians do not
know how much is earmarked for the National Assembly or how much money a
senator earns, they will not support you. We must understand the pulse
or the mood of the nation. The first step, therefore, is to open up the
National Assembly by ensuring transparency. Public office is what it is;
public. Also, at this critical time of austerity, be champions by
slashing your own budget.”
Evidently displeased by the remark, Mark responded: “Every time, people
will talk about National Assembly budget; for Heaven’s sake, unless you
would say you have never seen the national budget, it is a public
document. The National Assembly budget is there with every other
budget...people should appreciate what we are doing and not to come and
give an impression that our budget is bloated while every other person
had made a cut. I think we should not play politics with what is a very
serious issue. Our budget is in the open and everybody can see it.”
The Ghanaian Parliamentary Speaker and Minority Leader presented
interesting perspectives about politics in their country but when it was
my turn to speak, I prefaced my presentation with a joke. I told the
audience that on my way from Abuja, I encountered a friend who wondered
why I would agree to be resource person at a PDP gathering and I
responded by borrowing from the latest presidential wisdom: “I am for
everybody and I am for nobody”. But I began by urging the PDP leaders to
look inwards as they tried to find explanations for their defeat.
I reminded them of a famous refrain that “oppositions don’t win
elections, governments lose them”, before adding that if the PDP would
be honest with itself, its leaders should be able to accept that they
took Nigerians for granted while the opposition was clever in exploiting
popular discontent with the federal government’s approach to such
issues as, for instance, the fight against corruption. However, I also
added that just a few days in power, APC is already coming to terms with
the fact that the view of the road changes the moment you move from the
passenger’s side to the driver’s seat. Yet, as I told the PDP, they
have to stand up and begin to hold the APC to account on its promises to
Nigerians. This was how I made the point:
“In 2011, against popular expectation, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan, until
last week the president of Nigeria and the PDP candidate in the March
election, declared his assets as prescribed by the 1999 Constitution.
But he refused to make it public as demanded by many Nigerians. The
media and the opposition feasted on the story but Dr. Jonathan would not
yield ground, leading to the famous refrain, ‘I don’t give a damn!’
which became a good campaign slogan for the opposition. Indeed, in the
course of the electioneering campaign, Muhammadu Buhari (now president),
promised to declare his assets publicly. Buhari even went further to
state that should he be elected president, anybody who would serve in
his administration would be compelled to make such public disclosure.
“Now that he has become President, Buhari has refused to make public
his assets declaration form. His spokesman, Mallam Garba Shehu, has said
that whoever wants to know what Buhari owns should go through the
Freedom of Information Act to request for the document from the Code of
Conduct Bureau (CCB). Against the background that when a similar request
was made to CCB in February 2012 about then President Jonathan the
Bureau said certain provisions of the Nigerian constitution ‘precluded’
it from releasing such information to the public, it is obvious that
Buhari’s spokesman is just trying to hide behind one finger.
In calling on the PDP leaders to begin to play its role as an effective
opposition, I reminded them that Dr. Jonathan never made any promise
that he would declare his assets publicly on grounds that the
Constitution did not demand such of him yet he was harassed by APC
leaders for not yielding to public opinion on the issue. In fact, that
issue undermined President Jonathan’s credibility and helped in no small
measure to tar him with the brush of a man whose “body language
supports corruption”. On the other hand, the APC candidate whose main
credential was anti-corruption promised to make a public declaration of
assets. So if he reneges, the implication would be that he obtained the
votes of Nigerians by false pretence!
All said, I came away from Port Harcourt with the impression that PDP
is really in trouble and with it, our democracy. I spoke to some of the
members-elect, especially the new ones and most of them told me that
whatever may be the grievances of the party’s NWC members about the
manner the campaign was handled, they laid the foundation for the defeat
with the mismanagement of the primaries that became a bazaar with the
party’s tickets in most instances, going to the highest bidders.
“Everybody paid heavily for his or her PDP ticket. Even Dr. Jonathan
must have paid them a lot of money otherwise they would not have behaved
the way they did by shutting out other contenders and disgracefully
printing only one nomination form for him as sole candidate. That was
perhaps why he treated them with so much contempt,” the senator-elect
told me.
However, what worries me more about the PDP is that there is a feeling
that many would want to abandon the party. I understand that some
members are already planning to form a new party and I don’t understand
the logic behind such an idea. Everyday also comes with news of one
chieftain or another crossing over to the APC where they are looking for
“what to eat”. In fact, a new governor who attended the retreat told me
that “but for the recent ruling of Supreme Court over that says
lawmakers would lose their seats if they cross-carpet, majority of the
people you see here today would have crossed over to the APC.”
All said, it is important for the PDP to put the elections behind them
as they seek to forge ahead and I think the Port Harcourt retreat was
very helpful as they move along that direction. To the extent that the
very essence of democracy is dissent and debate, we need a strong PDP
that can hold the APC federal government to account on its promises and
obligations to the Nigerian people while at the same time serving as a
watchdog to ensure that President Buhari acts within the bounds of law
and public decency.
But in playing its role, Ekweremadu has set out the parameters for the
PDP that the leaders would do well to heed, if they intend to be taken
seriously by Nigerians: “Ours should not be an opposition that sees
nothing good in any government action or policy. We should not engage in
market square propaganda and destructive criticism that turn truth
upside-down or tends to incite the citizenry against the government in
power. The inherent danger in this brand of opposition is that apart
from overheating the polity and detracting from good governance, even if
such propaganda and false promises get you to power, it will not keep
you there. So, we must oppose responsibly and patriotically. We must
play by the rules and stick to verifiable facts.”
I wish the PDP leaders all the best, as they begin their journey into a
territory where, as President Jonathan warned, there might not be much
to “eat” because the “food” is now on the other side!
Buhari Versus Boko Haram
When I woke up at the Pinnacle Hotel in Maiduguri last Friday morning, I
had no inkling that anything had happened in the course of the night
until I went to the front desk to enquire why there had been no light
for more than an hour. It was there that I met several of the guests
discussing the trauma that kept them awake all night. It turned out that
from around midnight till the wee hours of the morning, there were
heavy gunshots from Boko Haram insurgents who, for the first time,
launched rocket-propelled grenades into the Maiduguri township, killing
several people in the process. Fortunately for me, because I was tired, I
slept though it all. By the afternoon of the next day (Saturday May
30), death came for some Maiduguri residents by way of a suicide bomber
inside a mosque and by Sunday afternoon when I was leaving the city, it
was a market that Boko Haram attacked.
While I intend to do a comprehensive report of my four-day sojourn in
Maiduguri (as well as the atrocities of Boko Haram in the state) another
day, what is very clear is that the insurgents still remain a potent
force that has to be confronted with all the might of the Nigerian
state. That has become even more important with the way the Islamic
State (IS) is spreading its tentacles and dangerous ideology, including
to such a not-too-distant country as Libya. That, I understand, may have
accounted for the new capacity being acquired by Boko Haram whose men
released a video during the week under the banner of Islamic State for
West Africa.
I believe President Goodluck Jonathan did a lot in recent months to
degrade the capacity of Boko Haram and we must commend our armed forces
for their efforts in that regard. But a lot still needs to be done if
our country is to defeat the insurgency. While the jury is still out as
to whether President Muhammadu Buhari’s decision to relocate the command
centre “to Maiduguri and remain until Boko Haram is completely subdued”
is a solution, there is no doubt that we need to trust in his judgement
and support him.
I believe Buhari is sending the right signals by making the visit to
Chad and Niger (our immediate and strategic neighbours) his first
official trips outside the country. It is a powerful symbolic gesture
that is commendable. As difficult as the security situation may seem,
with everybody working on the same page and President Buhari providing
the right leadership, we can defeat Boko Haram. It is in our collective
interest as a nation that we support him in that direction.
No comments:
Post a Comment